Return on Investment - A Measuring Tool
In evaluating Receivers, it is tempting to use raw
statistics as a measuring stick, but how
do you compare players stats for a WR in a run based system vs one in a more
balanced or pass heavy system? Is it sensible
to just focus on the players with the most receiving yards or TD or both?
ROI or Return on Investment is a simple way to approach to
comparing production efficiency between receivers regardless of statistical
volume.
Quite simply, ROI compares the relationship between the rates of a receiver’s
of targets, receptions and yards relative to the rest of the team and analyzes
the numbers from an efficiency standpoint.
For more on ROI, please follow this link.
Until reliable FCS passing targets numbers circulate, ROI will
be based only on receptions and yards.
ROI Plus...
Of the 200 FCS receivers in terms of reception yards, we
have reduced the list down to 10 draft eligible players who check the box on
the following criteria:
Standard Deviation Range
Within 1 standard deviation of the average number of
receptions for the Top 200 receivers in the sample (the average number of receptions
was 57.9).
Reception to Touchdown Ratio
Had a Reception to Touchdown ratio that was better than the
average of 1 TD per every 11.56 receptions.
Minimum Raw ROI
Raw ROI was above the 14.4% average (that is, each player
generated greater than 14.4% more reception yards than their share of
receptions).
Below Average QB Completion Percentage
Team pass completion % was below the 59.1% of all FCS teams
(thus, the WR had to contend with statistically less accurate QBs).
Minimum Adjusted ROI
Finally, the receiver’s QB weighted ROI (which considers QB
accuracy) is also above the 13.8% average.
Of the Top 200 receivers in FCS, only ten meet the above criteria.
Player
|
School
|
Recs
|
Yards
|
TDs
|
Recs /TD
|
% Team Recs
|
% Team Rec Yards
|
ROI
|
ROI/Avg
|
Team Comp %
|
QB Adj ROI
|
Purdue
|
49
|
951
|
10
|
4.9
|
15.7%
|
26.9%
|
71.1%
|
4.93
|
56.0%
|
73.8%
|
|
Texas A&M
|
61
|
1039
|
12
|
5.1
|
23.9%
|
31.3%
|
30.9%
|
2.15
|
54.4%
|
35.3%
|
|
South Ala.
|
49
|
822
|
5
|
9.8
|
21.0%
|
25.9%
|
23.3%
|
1.62
|
56.0%
|
26.1%
|
|
Utah
|
45
|
711
|
5
|
9.0
|
21.2%
|
25.2%
|
18.9%
|
1.31
|
53.1%
|
24.5%
|
|
Wyoming
|
72
|
1326
|
14
|
5.1
|
34.3%
|
41.3%
|
20.6%
|
1.43
|
55.4%
|
23.9%
|
|
Northwestern
|
90
|
1247
|
12
|
7.5
|
31.9%
|
39.1%
|
22.6%
|
1.57
|
58.4%
|
23.2%
|
|
Hawaii
|
73
|
1100
|
8
|
9.1
|
28.4%
|
34.5%
|
21.6%
|
1.50
|
58.7%
|
21.9%
|
|
Akron
|
62
|
1018
|
6
|
10.3
|
28.6%
|
33.2%
|
16.3%
|
1.13
|
54.8%
|
20.2%
|
|
Michigan St.
|
53
|
789
|
5
|
10.6
|
25.1%
|
29.6%
|
17.7%
|
1.23
|
57.0%
|
19.5%
|
|
Northern Ill.
|
87
|
1156
|
8
|
10.9
|
37.5%
|
43.0%
|
14.7%
|
1.02
|
58.0%
|
15.6%
|
|
Top 200 Averages
|
58
|
11.6
|
14.4%
|
59.1%
|
13.8%
|
The Top 10
DeAngelo Yancey: He was consistently a top 10 ROI receiver
this year. Played on a team without a
lot of success so fell through the cracks. Not only was he #1 in ROI (for WR's within 1 stdev of the Receptions average) but it took him less than 5 receptions to manufacture a touchdown in 2016. For perspective, the projected WR1 Mike Williams from Clemson scored every 8.9 receptions. Overall receiving yardage leader Trent Taylor of Louisiana Tech scored every 11.3 catches.
Josh Reynolds: I’ve been talking about him since he got to
TAMU from JC – tough, confident and will outlast the DBs. On a team that recruited so many top high
school WRs, Reynolds was clearly the best wide out for the Aggies. If I had to go into battle with one WR in this
draft, this is my guy.
Josh Magee: Have to admit I knew nothing about him until this final
run of the analytical model because his reception total must have risen above
the minimum required for inclusion in the rankings. Former MLB player who transferred from
Alabama to UAB (to be close to home after his father became ill) to Southern
Alabama (after UAB shut down their program), he has a lot of wear on the tires
but that experience could come cheap if he’s invited in as an UDFA.
Tim Patrick: He was dominant in ROI for most of the year and
then his reception total waned to up him under the minimum required for inclusion
but he’s come back at the end of the year. Not flashy, but a big target who can
come down with the ball.
Tanner Gentry: After
Josh Reynolds, I’m hitching my wagon to Tanner.
Just a tough guy who has a huge desire to win. Played hurt most of 2015 before he had to
shut it down early, he picked up where he left off last year where he was also
a high ROI player. Watch him in the
Mountain West championship game hoist his team on his back to make play after
play down the stretch to almost pull the upset. The guy will grind and grind and grind.
Austin Carr: In 2015, Nebraska WR Jordan Westerkamp was a player I didn’t want
to acknowledge as having the goods but he played so well week in and week out, I
had to pay homage by making him my Twitter page banner. In 2016, it was Carr who kept defying my
assertion that he would fade away. He never did fade and was actually one of the 3 Biletnikoff Award finalists. Typically, ROI erodes as receptions increase
beyond 1 standard deviation of the average but in this case, Carr has blown
away that myth. Not sure where I would draft him and not sure how I think his
career will go but he’s a quality man that will instantly give any team a
locker room lift.
Marcus Kemp: The
scout who convinces his team to throw the dice on this man as an UDFA will end
up a GM somewhere. Kemp is the best kept
secret out there at his position. He is
a tough, smart, experienced receiver who works to set up the DBs all game to
exploit them once they think they know his next more. He was possibly the only weapon Hawaii had on offense yet defenses couldn’t stop
this 1,100 yard gainer.
Jerome Lane: Lane’s father
Robert was a NFL LB and, although his son plays a different position, he has a
similar fire and attitude to win.
Despite playing for an Akron team that struggled, he went over 1000
yards receiving and maintained well above average ROI.
R.J. Shelton: I have to admit, when Conner Cook went to the
NFL, I kinda checked out of MSU. Like
Magee, I have not followed Shelton and will need to do some research before
giving an opinion.
Kenny Golladay: In
2015, I expected a receiver named Juwan Brescacin to start his senior year as
the #1 option in the NIU receiving game.
His final year was stunningly silent due to the domination of a University
of North Dakota transfer named Kenny Golladay who, for lack of a better term,
ate Brescacin’s lunch. Kenny has been the go to guy at NIU and should be a nice
pick up at the next level.
Shameless Self-Promotion!
I would love ideas on any "non-brand name" receivers from any division you might want reviewed in a future article. Feel free to email requests to boombearfootballmail.
Also, go like the new Boombearjr Football Analysis Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/boombearjr/.
No comments:
Post a Comment